Nobilis Long Pond No. 47 ITP 2007
Most praise its fruity, creamy Long Pond profile, good body and long finish. Critics find the alcohol hot and a bit young or astringent. Consensus: a powerful, well-made ITP for seasoned sippers.
Seasoned Jamaican fans who enjoy lower-ester Long Pond with a Foursquare‑like mix of coconut, vanilla, caramel and wood at full cask strength.
Details about this rum
Live auctions
This rum is currently being offered by one of our verified auction house partners. RumX helps you discover and bid on rare rums.
How does this rum taste?
Creamy, fruity Long Pond with serious power
You’ll probably enjoy this if you like Long Pond character but prefer it creamier, less funky and more coconut‑vanilla driven, and you’re comfortable taming a near‑70% cask strength bottling.
Beginners, anyone sensitive to high ABV or those who dislike woody, slightly astringent profiles in their Jamaican rum.
Community purchases
The RumX community has already added 16 bottles to their collections:
Digitize your rum collection and get exciting insights into the market value of your collection or individual bottles:
You may also enjoy
The identification of similar rums is based on the tasting notes of the community and the key data of the rum.
About the Long Pond distillery
The Long Pond distillery is located in Jamaica. Rums from Long Pond have been reviewed 6,349 times with an average of 8.5/10.
By rum lovers, for rum lovers
I'm Oliver – together with Jakob, Robert, and Lukas, we started RumX in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.
What began as a digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans: over 25,000 bottlings, 270,000+ independent reviews, and an active community with 50,000 members. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, allowing you to shop securely and manage your collection directly from the app.
The goal? To offer you, the rum connoisseur, a place where you can choose with confidence—without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.









The first whiff I got when opening the bottle for sampling was a hint of coconut, which immediately reminded me of Rum Sponge ITP. Blindly, you could almost guess a Foursquare from the smell. Overall, I even remember liking it a little better than the Rum Sponge. They don't have much in common in terms of price. Let's see how it compares.
First-class Long Pond with plenty of (tropical as well as dried) fruit, caramel, coconut, barrel and wood aromas, which are pronounced to varying degrees from nose to finish. The alcohol tweaks the palate a little. Inexperienced drinkers will probably reach their limits here.
Right up my alley, LP with proper tropical maturation (13y) + 4y continental. Directly a small LP crosstasting to see where the Nobilis ranks with me :) Also in the party: 3 x 2007 ITP: Nobilis No. 47 17y, Schotmann 16y, Barikenn 15y 2 x VRW: The Nectar 2005 15y, Velier Vale Royal 2006 12y The high ABV of the Nobilis pinches both the nose and the palate a little. After 2 hours in the glass, this subsides somewhat, at least on the nose. Overall, I like the nose very much and compared to the other ITPs it is more fruity, very inviting and round. The Schotmann is quite woody and spicy on the palate, slightly bitter. The Barikenn is very similar to the Schotmann, but has a little more fruit, especially on the palate. The Nobilis is quite similar, but has surprisingly less woodiness than the other ITPs, but a slight astringency. For me, all 3 ITPs are on the same level, with the Barikenn winning in terms of PLV. However, I like the VRWs (which I have already tasted several times) a little better overall, as the profile simply appeals to me more. I especially like the mango/passion fruit note, which is particularly pronounced in the 2005 LPs. For me, the PLV is right here and if I didn't already have so many LPs, I'd get myself a bottle :D
I'm not really warming to this Long Pond at the moment. I don't find the nose the most pleasant, as it has the markers I'm familiar with. On the palate, however, it's a little too spicy and roasty for me. The alcohol is also not quite well integrated. I'll give it a second chance in a few days' time