Diamond S.B.S Guyana REV
Prune and wood meet spice, leather, long finish, refined strength.
Prunes, dried fruit, wood, and leather shape a deep, spicy aroma and palate, layered with black tea and subtle sweetness. Community consensus highlights remarkable balance, authentic character, and strong price-to-quality—well worth discovering for lovers of mature Guyana rums.
Live auctions
How does this rum taste?
Intense dried fruit and prunes lead the S.B.S Guyana REV’s striking, concentrated profile, balanced with dark wood, leather, black tea, and hints of spice and syrup. RumX tasters celebrate its fruity complexity, long finish, and polished cask strength, noting subtle herbal and mineral layers. This 15-year, limited Diamond distillery bottling is a rewarding sip for fans of classic, fruit-driven Demerara rums looking for depth and value. Try it while it lasts.
Expert reviews
- L'amateur éclairé
amateureclaire.fr - Tasting Bro's
tastingbros.com Are you a blogger and want to publish your articles for free on RumX to boost your reach? Contact us!
Details about this rum
How is the price of this rum developing?
The RumX community has already added 50 bottles to their collections:
Digitize your rum collection and get exciting insights into the market value of your collection or individual bottles:
You may also enjoy
The identification of similar rums is based on the tasting notes of the community and the key data of the rum.
About the Diamond distillery
The Diamond distillery is located in Guyana. Rums from Diamond have been reviewed 4,203 times with an average of 8.3/10.
To DiamondInteractive Map
This map requires your consent to load Google Maps content.
On their first encounter, SBS and Nobilis are very much toe to toe. Nose goes to Nobilis for a little more openness and complexity. SBS takes the palate with (comparably) less wood/bitterness which leaves more room for some dried red fruits, which I don’t really find in the Nobilis very much - on my first try at least 🤔 Both very nice REVs, if you do enjoy this kind of dark and bitter profile.
Exciting extension of the REV saga - the corresponding DNA is recognizable, but it is quite clearly not up to the 94 vintage for me. The nose still convinces me a good deal more than the taste experience in the mouth, where unfortunately the alcohol remains a bit too present. Compared to other 2006 REVs on the milder side, more balanced, perhaps also thanks to the somewhat shorter storage time - other releases already show significantly more bitterness (Nobilis) or smoke (Romdeluxe). Slight deductions for the in my opinion somewhat too clear alcohol sharpness.
Update: I like increasingly worse. In the mouth quite one-dimensional and thin. -2Original:Rusty along with the SBS 2006, the first RA 2004 and the second RA 1994 - the latter dances a bit out of line. If the 2006 is a REV, then so are the 2004 MDXC. There are differences, but are as great between the 2004 bottlings as compared to the 2006.This bottling is the most drinkable of the four, the powerful that also so characterized the first RA 1994 takes a back seat even further here, the prune playing full out. The nose is softer and more restrained than the 2004s. In the mouth, a sweetness is present that neither the 2004s nor the 1994s bring. Despite the darker color, the sweetness is more reminiscent of molasses and candied fruit than burnt caramel.
Second tasting: a very good rum, rating relativized (-2)Nose: very inviting and heavy with lots of spiciness and... black tea!Mouth: here the spiciness immediately takes over accompanied by a nice sweetness of caramelized brown sugar and a medicinal bitterness.Finish: fades faster than expected but long and intense with barrel, sweetness and bitter notes.What a great rum!